Despite our years of intimate association, the standards by which you deem others incredible continue to elude me.
My only conclusion is that you've somehow managed to avoid all mirrors, reflective surfaces, and thoughts of a self-introspecting nature for nearly four decades.
Considering how rarely I follow your medical advice, you are arguably only my doctor in the possessive since.
[Not that he means to imply he has any claim over John, or that he feels he belongs to him in some small way, heaven forbid.]
We ought to think of a more accurate title. My Doctor is misleading; while admirable I would hardly consider it your most valuable quality. Rather, you have a singular talent for illumination, for casting out the shadows that so often muddy the waters of my mind.
In that fashion, you are not so much my doctor as you are my conductor of light.
I will give the thought due consideration if you, in turn, consider why wild speculation as to the particulars of our relationship is such a cause of concern for you.
Firstly, as you may have noticed, I am not particularly bothered by the impressions and opinions others have of me. So long as their suppositions are not libelous or offensive to my character, they are not worth consideration.
Second, I can see precisely how the average observer might have come to the conclusion. Erroneous though it is, the logic behind it is sound, and so it is inoffensive to my sensibilities as a detective.
Lastly, I am not entirely opposed to the notion of engaging another man in sexual congress, and so it would be rather hypocritical of me to take offense to speculation regarding whether or not your cock has been in my person, or vice versa.
By the hypothetical or my uncharacteristically blunt use of the word cock?.
[John is absolutely endearing when he's flustered, and if he hasn't figured that out by now, Sherlock will just have to keep pressing the issue until he realizes.]
Had I known your sensibilities were so delicate I would have chosen my words more carefully.
Can we -- I don't know, stop discussing this and return our attention to your cigarette addiction? Far safer. I don't mean safer as in -- I mean. Could you be helpful for just a second and get me out of this one with my dignity intact?
Well, it's not so much my question, really - it was yours. I was working under the assumption that you would follow up my answer with your own.
[Only in Sherlock's world are silent expectations considered the same as verbalized questions.] I said I was unbothered by the speculation regarding the nature of our relationship, you asked why, and I gave my reasons.
That you did not follow with your own thoughts on the matter is somewhat contrary to the give-and-take nature of conversation.
I dislike people assuming -- things about my sexuality that are, under no circumstances, their bloody business anyway. Besides, I have a lesbian sister, remember? I've seen what people usually mean when they talk about someone being gay and it's rarely based on anything but stereotypes and demeaning prejudice. Why would I want to be associated with a --- in my case even fake identity that has so many negative connotations? Hell, had I been gay, which I'm not, I'd have to do some spectacular mental wriggling to fit into that -- term.
Whatever it may imply about us, Sherlock, my issue is 100% more related to what it implies about me.
2/2
John, no.
I know what you're about to say, I realized it the moment I texted what I did, so you can stop typing.
John.
John if I read the words irony or hypocrisy within the next thirty seconds, I'm blocking your number.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
My only conclusion is that you've somehow managed to avoid all mirrors, reflective surfaces, and thoughts of a self-introspecting nature for nearly four decades.
no subject
Luckily the good heavily outweighs the bad, here.
no subject
The "perhaps" was really quite generous of you.
no subject
no subject
[Actually it's just a general friend thing not a doctor thing, but Sherlock hasn't had enough experience with either to really know.]
no subject
[ The term you're looking for is friend, Sherlock, look it up. ]
Your doctor.
no subject
[Not that he means to imply he has any claim over John, or that he feels he belongs to him in some small way, heaven forbid.]
We ought to think of a more accurate title. My Doctor is misleading; while admirable I would hardly consider it your most valuable quality. Rather, you have a singular talent for illumination, for casting out the shadows that so often muddy the waters of my mind.
In that fashion, you are not so much my doctor as you are my conductor of light.
no subject
Secondly. Thank you. Being nice suits you, Sherlock, you should consider doing it more often.
no subject
no subject
1/2
Firstly, as you may have noticed, I am not particularly bothered by the impressions and opinions others have of me. So long as their suppositions are not libelous or offensive to my character, they are not worth consideration.
Second, I can see precisely how the average observer might have come to the conclusion. Erroneous though it is, the logic behind it is sound, and so it is inoffensive to my sensibilities as a detective.
2/2
no subject
no subject
[John is absolutely endearing when he's flustered, and if he hasn't figured that out by now, Sherlock will just have to keep pressing the issue until he realizes.]
Had I known your sensibilities were so delicate I would have chosen my words more carefully.
no subject
no subject
[Rich, coming from him.]
I assure you, your dignity has survived far worse than an uncomfortable conversation.
You never did answer my question, by the by.
no subject
no subject
[Only in Sherlock's world are silent expectations considered the same as verbalized questions.]
I said I was unbothered by the speculation regarding the nature of our relationship, you asked why, and I gave my reasons.
That you did not follow with your own thoughts on the matter is somewhat contrary to the give-and-take nature of conversation.
no subject
I dislike people assuming -- things about my sexuality that are, under no circumstances, their bloody business anyway. Besides, I have a lesbian sister, remember? I've seen what people usually mean when they talk about someone being gay and it's rarely based on anything but stereotypes and demeaning prejudice. Why would I want to be associated with a --- in my case even fake identity that has so many negative connotations? Hell, had I been gay, which I'm not, I'd have to do some spectacular mental wriggling to fit into that -- term.
Whatever it may imply about us, Sherlock, my issue is 100% more related to what it implies about me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)