docwithablog: (all the handsome men are gay)
Dr John Watson ([personal profile] docwithablog) wrote2020-01-01 10:12 am
Entry tags:

open post version 2.






( TEXTS )
( AUDIO )
( VISUAL )
( PROMPTS )
( OVERFLOW )



2/2

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-21 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
[...Oh goddamn it he just left himself open for a very scathing and obvious rebuttable.]

John, no.

I know what you're about to say, I realized it the moment I texted what I did, so you can stop typing.



John.



John if I read the words irony or hypocrisy within the next thirty seconds, I'm blocking your number.

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-21 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
It's your turn to be insufferable now, is it?

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-21 05:43 am (UTC)(link)
After the lecture I was just given, are you certain you should really be following my example?

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-21 06:20 am (UTC)(link)
Despite our years of intimate association, the standards by which you deem others incredible continue to elude me.

My only conclusion is that you've somehow managed to avoid all mirrors, reflective surfaces, and thoughts of a self-introspecting nature for nearly four decades.

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-22 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
My Blushes, John.

The "perhaps" was really quite generous of you.

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-22 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
I wager I would annoy you quite a bit less if you hadn't so deeply invested yourself in my physical well-being, compulsive doctor that you are.

[Actually it's just a general friend thing not a doctor thing, but Sherlock hasn't had enough experience with either to really know.]

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-22 08:52 am (UTC)(link)
Considering how rarely I follow your medical advice, you are arguably only my doctor in the possessive since.

[Not that he means to imply he has any claim over John, or that he feels he belongs to him in some small way, heaven forbid.]

We ought to think of a more accurate title. My Doctor is misleading; while admirable I would hardly consider it your most valuable quality. Rather, you have a singular talent for illumination, for casting out the shadows that so often muddy the waters of my mind.

In that fashion, you are not so much my doctor as you are my conductor of light.

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-22 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I will give the thought due consideration if you, in turn, consider why wild speculation as to the particulars of our relationship is such a cause of concern for you.

1/2

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-23 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, where to begin?

Firstly, as you may have noticed, I am not particularly bothered by the impressions and opinions others have of me. So long as their suppositions are not libelous or offensive to my character, they are not worth consideration.

Second, I can see precisely how the average observer might have come to the conclusion. Erroneous though it is, the logic behind it is sound, and so it is inoffensive to my sensibilities as a detective.

2/2

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-23 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
Lastly, I am not entirely opposed to the notion of engaging another man in sexual congress, and so it would be rather hypocritical of me to take offense to speculation regarding whether or not your cock has been in my person, or vice versa.

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-23 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
By the hypothetical or my uncharacteristically blunt use of the word cock?.

[John is absolutely endearing when he's flustered, and if he hasn't figured that out by now, Sherlock will just have to keep pressing the issue until he realizes.]

Had I known your sensibilities were so delicate I would have chosen my words more carefully.

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-23 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
Please, John, don't be so dramatic.

[Rich, coming from him.]

I assure you, your dignity has survived far worse than an uncomfortable conversation.


You never did answer my question, by the by.

[personal profile] acutereasoner 2019-05-23 05:42 am (UTC)(link)
Well, it's not so much my question, really - it was yours. I was working under the assumption that you would follow up my answer with your own.

[Only in Sherlock's world are silent expectations considered the same as verbalized questions.]

I said I was unbothered by the speculation regarding the nature of our relationship, you asked why, and I gave my reasons.

That you did not follow with your own thoughts on the matter is somewhat contrary to the give-and-take nature of conversation.
Edited 2019-05-23 05:44 (UTC)

(no subject)

[personal profile] acutereasoner - 2019-05-23 06:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] acutereasoner - 2019-05-23 22:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] acutereasoner - 2019-05-24 20:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] acutereasoner - 2019-05-25 02:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] acutereasoner - 2019-05-25 06:09 (UTC) - Expand